A Garden’s Friends Through The Eyes Of A Child: Wisdom That Always Surprises

“Seek the wisdom of ages, but look at the world through the eyes of a child.” Not bad, if I’d said so myself. I hadn’t. Ron Wild had, according to the Internet attributions. I cannot find more about this Ron Wild than his very telling quote, but I was about to find more about his words.

“Grandpa, let’s name them.”

My granddaughter and I had discovered a box of yard art in the garage and were washing the objects in the grass.

“Please do,” I agreed. “What should this rabbit be called?”

3

 

 

 

 

 

Now, this hollow yard-art rabbit had an interesting story. (By the way, “yard art” are statues and things that folks in the United States use to decorate their outside flower beds and yards.) Years ago, I had found and placed this rabbit in a Houston bed of blooms beneath a budding crepe myrtle tree. Unbeknownst to me, fire ants had taken up residence inside the bunny. One day, I heard a scream and ran to find the bare legs of a little neighbor girl covered with stinging ants. (Another aside, fire ants crawl upon their victim and wait for a mysterious signal causing them all to sting at once on cue – an insidious and most unendearing trait.) I was planting, so I had a hose nearby. I sprayed off the little one’s legs, ran to the garage for the spray bottle of window cleaner, and returned to soak her swelling legs with the cleaner. (A secret of fire ant bites is that a dilute solution with just a bit of contained liquid ammonia, like a window cleaner, will neutralize the poison, take away the stinging and prevent any scarring.) Saved by the spray, the little one’s tears dried and she was off to play some more. I, for one, gave that rabbit a good talking to, moved the bunny to solid ant-free ground and returned often to check its interior for intruders.

“I think Isis is a good name for a rabbit. Don’t you Grandpa?”

My thought shifted with this curiously fitting pronouncement. In ancient mythology, Isis is an Egyptian goddess, the ideal mother and wife . . .  and the protector of children. Perhaps we were dealing with a reformed rabbit. I knew my granddaughter in the third grade was studying Greek and Roman gods and goddesses. Apparently, her teacher had bridged to the even older ways and names of the Pharaohs of the Nile.

“An excellent choice,” I agreed, smiling with my shifting sight. “Now, what name would you like for this duck?”

1

 

 

 

 

 

“Blueberry,” my young relative answered with a simple immediacy.

One does not question the wisdom of a child. It is far too much fun to listen and enjoy the thoughts. In my head, I could see Blueberry sitting coldly on my balcony patio in Uptown Dallas in early January two years past, a crown of snow forming on his head, feet buried in freezy white fluff, wishing wooden thoughts of a nice warm blueberry to munch for lunch. Blueberry is made of wood and he doesn’t eat, but it was a warm day today and I did have some blueberries inside. Maybe I’d leave one by the webbed feet of Mr. Blueberry and see what would happen.

“That name works nicely,” I said. “And, these two, what are their names?”

0

 

 

 

 

 

The thinking cap was on. Some seconds passed as my granddaughter’s weight shifted from foot to foot and a small young finger pointed here and there into the air.

“Hmmmm. . . .”  The little head moved slowly, cogitating deeply, stopping abruptly and announcing theatrically: “They are. . . . Fluff and Duff. Yes, their names are Fluff and Duff. Fluff is roosting and Duff is preening. A mom and a dad.”

Good words for a third grader. Roosting and preening. And, right-on. The two little birds had been a gift from my Mom and Dad.

It is a joy to observe the machinations of an innocent and uncluttered mind and wonder at what they can see that we can only guess.

“That should do it,” I concluded.

Placing the newly named members of the yard-art family around the potted plants, I glanced at a smiling hydrangea, my wife’s favorite blossom of springtime.

2

 

 

 

 

 

“The flowers seem to approve,” I nodded.

“Of course, Grandpa, they already knew the names.”

The wisdom of a child should always surprise.

 

Grandpa Jim

Dangling With Prepositions And Angling For Northern Pike

What on earth is a “dangling preposition”?

Let us consult . . . the Internet. I am almost said “an expert”, but that is a whole new post.

Back to this post, a “dangling preposition” is, according to the Internet. . . . Wow, Wikipedia, the #1 hit, is for once unintelligible. Let’s try second place. Ok, here are examples of dangling prepositions according to site #2: who are you going with; which box did you put it in; and who’s the letter addressed to? With, in and to at the end of these sentences are the prepositions, and they are dangling because they do not have an object attached.

In the English language (or at least the American English I’m using here) a preposition is a “directing word” (you might call it a “finger-pointing word”). The wagging digit demands an answer. What? Who? Where? In other words (and these are my words, not my High School Grammar Teacher): “Don’t you ever preposition me without an object to your advances?”

Okay, but let’s consider the Grammarians acceptable answer to the connundrum of the dangling prepositional phrase.

Here is how an astute artist of aura-words would paint those sentences “correctly” today. With whom are you going? In which box did you put it? To whom is that letter addressed? Have you ever heard the likes of that? Land O Goshen. I should think not, unless you are up very late and viewing a very old English movie. In this day and age, no one would dare address another in such a formalized vernacular. The covered mouths, rolling eyes and snickers would blanket with embarrassment and muffle the very speech.

Simply stated, dangling prepositions are perfectly acceptable in everyday speech. Should they be anticipated in the everyday writing of our times? On the written page, do prepositions always have to be followed by an object? Is such dictated phraseology archaic, old-fashioned, borderingly puerile and perhaps demeaning to a freely given and happily written dangling preposition?

In summary, do prepositions always need the clutter of objects to end with? Can and should dangling at the end of a line be allowed, approved, accepted and applauded, as it is in angling — especially at this time of the year?

“Where are you going to?” I asked. “About 25 hours by car, directly north,” he responded. “Want to go along?” he asked. “Above the Great Lakes, I bet,” I said, and added, “Where at?” “A little lake in the woods, by the name of Separation, just north of  Kenora, Ontario. There’ll be plenty of Pike, to keep our rods bent with the fight of the fish, before the catch and release after and back to.” “Their watery home?” I asked. “You betcha,” he answered.

Footnote: A Northern Pike is an aquatic monster of the North Woods, way up there in Canada and around. You’ll find some of ‘em in Minnesota. I remember on the Boundary Waters along the Minnesota border glancing over the side of our small boat at our stringer of smallish fish only to see this huge elongated and armored shape open a gaping maw full of glistening teeth as the ravaging denizen of the deep water considered swallowing the bunch, stringer and all, and then be off – perhaps sinking us as the great fish savored its late afternoon repast. I have hooked a few of that Northern’s cousins, but never a granddaddy of comparable size and contemplative stare – a young lad’s memory to savor all one’s life and beyond.

Angling for the great fish of the Northern Woods is where I’d like to be at. I mean I’d dangle a preposition over the side of that boat and wait for the next to happen by. With luck, I might hook the object of a great fight and bring the monster in and close up. Reaching down into the cold water, I’d carefully extract the hook and send that fighting fish right back to. The lake ripples echoing my happy sigh, I’d slump back and watch the limp line dangle against the clear blue sky, delighted to have sighted again the goal of my long-sought quest, refreshed and satisfied, not needing to mount that fearsome object at the end of a worn phrase above a fabricated mantel for the dusts of forgotten usage to sully and slowly collect upon.

As they say in the far timber: “Keep angling at and that line may be dangling with. Luck, you betcha.”

They appreciate their prepositions up that away and the freedom of their objects.

To them, dangling and angling have always been compatible.

Up there in the colder climbs and there about.

Good fishin’.

 

Grandpa Fisherman

Saved By The Bell, Pugilists, Saved By The Rain, Corn, Drought, The Future, Climate Change, Mebbe, Dunno

 

In boxing, the phrase “saved by the bell” means one of the fighters has been knocked to the mat and the referee is hovering above the slumped combatant. The referee is in the middle of the count to “ten and you’re out.” Suddenly the bell rings signifying the end of the round. The downed fighter’s trainer jumps over the ropes and drags the dazed pugilist to a little round stool in the corner to recover and fight again.

The fallen fighter was saved by the bell.

Something fell last Thursday, this Monday and Tuesday early that for the early corn in the fields was like being saved by the bell. Uncle Joe was up on Wednesday, and he said that little corn “was about to be hurt.” After the rains, which totaled around 5 inches, Joe said he could hear the corn growing out there in the fields and “it was knee-high.” That’s what happened. It rained. A good one too.

The young corn was saved by the rain.

Never doubt drought is a fearsome thing. Much of Texas is in the midst of severe dryness. The climate cooperated this past week, but some say that climate is changing and may not be as cooperative in the future.

The future is a fuzzy place, little known and even less subject to prediction.

Climate change has been announced to be upon us. My definition of climate change is “the climate is changing.” Here in Texas they say “if you don’t like the weather, wait ten minutes.” That’s the way the weather is, always changing. One minute you’re freezing, the next minute you’re baking. Welcome to the Lone Star State.

So, “the climate is changing” must not be what the experts mean by climate change. Perhaps those science types mean “the climate is changing more quickly.” No, that can’t be it, weather by nature changes quickly. Always has. Wait, I got it. Those pocket protectors must be saying “the climate is changing more quickly in one direction.” That’s gotta be it. Like, we’re in a drought, and it will just be getting worse. But, it just rained and got better, and we all want it to keep getting better.

Perhaps we should leave that climate change to the experts and get back to farming.

Down in the country, there are two phrases you hear: “Dunno and “Mebbe.”

Farmers like those words — you even hear Uncle Joe use ‘em.

Lots of truth there, I think, down in the country.

Mebbe leave that climate to itself.

And get back to work.

 “Looks like rain.”

“Dunno.”

Grandpa Jim

Time After Time: Styne, Cahn, Sinatra — A Secret In Step With Time

One of the group raised a hand to ask a question. “Have any of you heard the new music for the show about Annie Oakley? Jerome Kern is writing the score. I think they’re going to call the production Annie Get Your Gun.

“If Kern wrote the music,” a voice near the piano says, “it probably sounds something like this.”

At this point, the speaker, Jule Styne, of Frank Sinatra’s songwriting team of Sammy Cahn (lyrics) and Jule Styne (music), moves to the piano and begins playing a tune.

Of course, Styne made up the whole thing. He knew nothing of the Annie Oakley show and he had never heard the new music, but Styne knew Kern’s work and Styne liked to improvise. Styne was a musical prodigy. He couldn’t help himself. So, he made up a tune and everyone liked it, even young Frankie over there in the corner.

Later, after being admonished by Cahn for brazen balderdashery and musical masqueradery, Styne humbly asked the lyricist to provide the words for the song. Cahn did, Styne fine-tuned the tune and Sinatra recorded the song on October 26, 1946.

It was an instant hit and went to #16 on the charts.

At the opening of Sinatra’s new movie, It happened in Brooklyn, the next year on April 7, 1947, the song was included. In fact, Sinatra’s character takes credit for writing the song, which is sung by Kathryn Grayson as she smiles sweetly at Peter Lawford, the shy young Englishman who would later make Kathryn’s character a duchess.

A very timely piece and well received at that.

Here a few of the lyrics:

 

Time after time

I tell myself that I’m

So lucky to be loving you

 

I only know what I know

The passing years will show

You’ve kept my love so young, so new

 

And time after time

You’ll hear me say that I’m

So lucky to be loving you

 

Not bad for a prodigy show-off ripping off someone else’s music they didn’t even write.

But, stop. Is this just of a bit schmaltzy feel-good music? Or, is it something else? Is it physics? Is this the long-sought secret of the mystery of time?

Great scientists have struggled for all time to understand time, and they, from a science standpoint, continue to miss the beat. They just can’t find the tune. Let’s see if Styne did.

The words “time”, “I” and “you” suggest a personal relationship with time, not a distant and cold imagining of equations. Relationship. Companionship. You, I and time.

“Time after time” and “passing” show time moving in a line. Amazingly, in that passing, the words “young” and “new” appear, where old and tired would seem more appropriate from our high school science lab experience. Have the eggheads in the backroom got it wrong? Is time a relationship that grows young and new, not old and stale, as we move forward in time?

Then, in the final line, we have the zinger, the simple phrase “loving you.” That’s the luck, the good fortune of time.

What on earth have Styne and Cahn done with this song?

Do you see it?

The keys word linkages: “I-you,” “young-new” and “love-you”?

The secret of time, of understanding and enjoying one of the greatest secrets in the universe, is a companion in time, a relationship. Not just I or you, but an I-you. That changes time to young-new, because the secret is love-you.

A companion in time is the secret of time.

Someone for each next step.

 Until the end.

Of  time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSGWsIQJdh8

 

 

Back In The Saddle Again: Gene Autry, Tom Hanks And Friends

I’m back in the saddle again

Out where a friend is a friend

Where the longhorn cattle feed

On the lowly jimsonweed

Back in the saddle again

 

Whoopi-ty-aye-oh

Rockin’ to and fro

Back in the saddle again

Whoopi-ty-aye-yay

I go my way

Back in the saddle again

 

The Singing Cowboy, Gene Autry, first released that tune in 1939. It became his signature song. Gene went on to become one of the most beloved and influential stars in the history of film, television, music, radio and live performance. He was a good guy with a great voice, and he is well remembered.

Remember back in 1993 when Tom Hanks in “Sleepless in Seattle” was getting up the courage to call for a first date while Gene in the background sang “Back in the Saddle Again” to encourage the young and widowed architect, Sam Baldwin, to go on there and just make that call.

Gene was always an encourager.

Gene Autry was born a Texan — on September 29, 1907 — in Tioga, Texas. If you take the Dallas North Tollway from where I sit today typing on this computer, the small town of Tioga is just 47.1 miles up that away. Not that far. Tioga is probably not that small anymore, part of the growing north suburbia of the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. That’s where Gene was born in 1907. He died 91 years later on October 2, 1998 in Studio City, California after appearing in 93 movies, starring in 91 episodes of the “Gene Autry Show” and crooning a parcel of country music songs to a waiting and eager audience.

Gene Autry was a hero. One writer refers to the Singing Cowboy as “honest, brave and true.” I believe that. I never met Gene, but I watched him on TV and I listened to his songs. He was a friend and an encourager when I, like Sam Baldwin, needed someone with a happy twang to encourage me on my way.

 

I’m back in the saddle again

Out where a friend is a friend

Where the longhorn cattle feed

On the lowly jimsonweed

Back in the saddle again

 

Been about a month since we last talked. Everything is fine. Thanks for thinking.

A lot has moved from the old place to our new house – just down the road from Tioga. A lot is still in process. My computer died the morning of the closing on the old house. Slowed me down a bit. Then I remembered Dad singing “Back in the Saddle Again” when I was a kid. Dad wasn’t a cowboy, but he had a beautiful Irish tenor. Like Gene, Dad was an encourager. I like to think they both found their new home humming a happy tune with a smile on their faces.

“Ragtime Cowboy Joe” and “Back in the Saddle Again.”

Good company, good memories and good friends.

 

Whoopi-ty-aye-oh

Rockin’ to and fro

Back in the saddle again

Whoopi-ty-aye-yay

I go my way

Back in the saddle again

 

It is good to be back . . . again.

Give a listen.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6dx8AfTmQk&list=RDBZqRL7nJB48&index=0

 

Grandpa Jim